The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1101
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.9
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.51
1102
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.54
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.51
1103
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.58
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1104
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.13
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1105
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1106
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.21
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1107
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.04
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1108
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.83
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1109
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.51
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1110
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.25
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1111
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 148.27
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1112
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 148.27
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 2.5
1113
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.65
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.49
1114
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.32
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.49
1115
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.15
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 2.49
1116
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.31
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.49
1117
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.49
1118
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 249.82
TTFR rankings: 621
Ratio Superior: 2.49
1119
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.6
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.48
1120
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 2.48
1121
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.36
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 2.48
1122
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.9
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 2.48
1123
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.99
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 2.48
1124
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.25
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.47
1125
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.21
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.47
1126
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.21
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.47
1127
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 243.94
TTFR rankings: 601
Ratio Superior: 2.46
1128
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.52
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.46
1129
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 148.27
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 2.46
1130
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.6
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.46
1131
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.92
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2.46
1132
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.57
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.45
1133
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.9
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.45
1134
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.24
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 2.45
1135
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.86
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.45
1136
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.99
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.45
1137
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.06
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 2.44
1138
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 200.33
TTFR rankings: 489
Ratio Superior: 2.44
1139
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.23
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 2.44
1140
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.69
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 2.43
1141
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 289.28
TTFR rankings: 704
Ratio Superior: 2.43
1142
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.74
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.43
1143
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.62
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.43
1144
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.34
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.43
1145
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.62
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 2.42
1146
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.52
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 2.42
1147
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.92
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.42
1148
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.25
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.42
1149
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 143.33
TTFR rankings: 346
Ratio Superior: 2.41
1150
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 180.82
TTFR rankings: 436
Ratio Superior: 2.41
1151
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.2
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.41
1152
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.24
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 2.41
1153
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.16
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 2.41
1154
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.6
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1155
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.65
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1156
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.13
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1157
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.16
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1158
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.58
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1159
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.65
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1160
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.65
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1161
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 119.15
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1162
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.34
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 2.4
1163
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.2
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 2.39
1164
Age: 17
Average rating: 120.57
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 2.39
1165
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.14
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 2.39
1166
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2.39
1167
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.39
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 2.38
1168
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 241.73
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 2.38
1169
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.62
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.38
1170
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.36
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.38
1171
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.83
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.38
1172
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.65
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 2.37
1173
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.73
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 2.37
1174
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 2.37
1175
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.75
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 2.37
1176
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.05
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.37
1177
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.21
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1178
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.38
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1179
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.25
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1180
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.02
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1181
Age: 18
Average rating: 168.97
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1182
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.73
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1183
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.39
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1184
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 336.37
TTFR rankings: 793
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1185
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.36
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1186
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.39
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1187
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.2
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2.36
1188
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.74
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.35
1189
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.72
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.35
1190
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.51
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.35
1191
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.51
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 2.35
1192
Age: 17
Average rating: 120.57
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 2.35
1193
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 345.62
TTFR rankings: 811
Ratio Superior: 2.35
1194
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 2.35
1195
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.97
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.34
1196
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.68
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.34
1197
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.68
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.34
1198
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.96
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 2.33
1199
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.16
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 2.33
1200
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.18
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 2.33

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников