The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1001
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.35
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.77
№1002
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 194.48
TTFR rankings: 537
Ratio Superior: 2.76
№1003
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 184.65
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 2.76
№1004
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.83
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.75
№1005
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 104.95
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 2.75
№1006
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.84
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.75
№1007
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.58
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 2.75
№1008
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.31
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 2.75
№1009
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.75
№1010
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.75
№1011
Age: 16
Average rating: 88.93
TTFR rankings: 244
Ratio Superior: 2.74
№1012
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.86
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.74
№1013
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.38
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.73
№1014
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.46
TTFR rankings: 272
Ratio Superior: 2.73
№1015
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 336.67
TTFR rankings: 918
Ratio Superior: 2.73
№1016
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 11.37
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.73
№1017
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.07
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 2.72
№1018
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.55
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.72
№1019
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 104.95
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 2.71
№1020
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 104.95
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 2.71
№1021
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.7
№1022
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.98
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 2.7
№1023
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.34
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.7
№1024
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 2.69
№1025
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.69
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 2.69
№1026
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 185.14
TTFR rankings: 498
Ratio Superior: 2.69
№1027
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.17
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.69
№1028
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.25
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.68
№1029
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.92
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 2.68
№1030
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.92
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 2.68
№1031
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 156.59
TTFR rankings: 420
Ratio Superior: 2.68
№1032
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.44
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 2.68
№1033
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.21
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 2.68
№1034
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.59
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 2.67
№1035
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.86
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.67
№1036
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.26
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 2.67
№1037
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.15
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.66
№1038
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.84
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 2.66
№1039
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.01
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 2.66
№1040
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.15
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.66
№1041
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 61.02
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 2.65
№1042
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 128.89
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 2.65
№1043
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.78
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.65
№1044
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.55
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.65
№1045
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.54
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.65
№1046
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.77
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.64
№1047
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.17
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 2.64
№1048
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.83
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.64
№1049
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.01
TTFR rankings: 208
Ratio Superior: 2.63
№1050
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 184.65
TTFR rankings: 486
Ratio Superior: 2.63
№1051
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.85
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.62
№1052
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 180.69
TTFR rankings: 473
Ratio Superior: 2.62
№1053
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.91
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 2.62
№1054
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.6
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 2.62
№1055
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.21
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 2.61
№1056
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.01
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 2.61
№1057
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.61
№1058
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.4
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 2.6
№1059
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.77
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 2.6
№1060
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.77
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 2.6
№1061
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.28
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 2.6
№1062
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.26
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 2.6
№1063
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.44
TTFR rankings: 266
Ratio Superior: 2.6
№1064
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.16
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.6
№1065
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.04
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.59
№1066
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 174.07
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 2.59
№1067
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.2
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 2.59
№1068
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 2.59
№1069
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.23
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.59
№1070
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.78
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 2.59
№1071
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 194.48
TTFR rankings: 502
Ratio Superior: 2.58
№1072
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.74
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 2.58
№1073
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 174.07
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№1074
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.73
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№1075
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.15
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№1076
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.2
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№1077
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.2
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№1078
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 10.9
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 2.57
№1079
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 208.68
TTFR rankings: 535
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№1080
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.34
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№1081
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.81
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№1082
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.13
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.56
№1083
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.99
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№1084
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.54
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№1085
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.28
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№1086
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 11.37
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№1087
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 156.59
TTFR rankings: 399
Ratio Superior: 2.55
№1088
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 174.07
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 2.54
№1089
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1090
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 180.69
TTFR rankings: 457
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1091
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.26
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1092
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 156.59
TTFR rankings: 396
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1093
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.15
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1094
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.15
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.53
№1095
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.25
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1096
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.28
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1097
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.16
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 2.52
№1098
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.52
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№1099
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.07
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 2.51
№1100
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.26
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 2.51
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
