The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
901
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.26
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 3.03
902
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.22
TTFR rankings: 285
Ratio Superior: 3.02
903
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.39
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 3.02
904
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.31
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 3.02
905
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.36
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 3.02
906
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.09
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 3.02
907
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.09
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 3.02
908
Age: 18.4
Average rating: 184.95
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 3.02
909
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.01
TTFR rankings: 419
Ratio Superior: 3.01
910
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 3.01
911
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 118.9
TTFR rankings: 358
Ratio Superior: 3.01
912
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 3
913
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.64
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 3
914
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.32
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 3
915
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 2.99
916
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.38
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.99
917
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.09
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 2.99
918
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.2
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 2.99
919
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 142.77
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 2.99
920
Age: 18
Average rating: 168.62
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 2.99
921
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.73
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 2.99
922
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.17
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.99
923
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.91
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 2.99
924
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.26
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 2.98
925
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 96.89
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 2.98
926
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 194.29
TTFR rankings: 579
Ratio Superior: 2.98
927
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.28
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 2.98
928
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.91
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 2.98
929
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.15
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.97
930
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 2.97
931
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.09
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 2.97
932
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.32
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.96
933
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.63
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 2.96
934
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.63
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 2.96
935
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.64
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 2.95
936
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.93
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.95
937
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 2.95
938
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.88
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 2.95
939
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.03
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 2.95
940
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.8
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.94
941
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.38
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.94
942
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.09
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 2.94
943
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.31
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 2.94
944
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.31
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.94
945
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.31
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 2.94
946
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.94
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 2.93
947
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.36
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 2.93
948
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.09
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.91
949
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.09
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 2.91
950
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.36
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 2.91
951
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 173.86
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 2.9
952
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.18
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 2.9
953
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.22
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.9
954
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.03
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.9
955
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.93
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.89
956
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.09
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 2.89
957
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.36
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 2.88
958
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 96.89
TTFR rankings: 279
Ratio Superior: 2.88
959
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 81.29
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 2.88
960
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.87
961
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 91.91
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 2.87
962
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 2.87
963
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.12
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 2.87
964
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.1
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.87
965
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.68
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.87
966
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.84
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 2.86
967
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.22
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 2.86
968
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.25
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 2.85
969
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.96
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 2.85
970
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 53.02
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 2.85
971
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.61
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 2.85
972
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 198.26
TTFR rankings: 563
Ratio Superior: 2.84
973
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 208.5
TTFR rankings: 592
Ratio Superior: 2.84
974
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.5
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 2.84
975
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.36
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 2.83
976
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 128.86
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 2.83
977
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.32
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 2.83
978
Age: 17
Average rating: 120.87
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 2.83
979
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.2
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 2.83
980
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 294.51
TTFR rankings: 832
Ratio Superior: 2.83
981
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 236.46
TTFR rankings: 668
Ratio Superior: 2.83
982
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.31
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 2.82
983
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 2.82
984
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.36
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 2.81
985
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.63
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 2.81
986
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.88
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 2.81
987
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.36
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 2.81
988
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.85
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.81
989
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.3
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 2.8
990
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.96
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 2.8
991
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.25
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 2.79
992
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.68
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 2.79
993
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 112.76
TTFR rankings: 314
Ratio Superior: 2.78
994
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.09
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 2.78
995
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.8
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 2.78
996
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.09
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 2.78
997
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.65
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 2.78
998
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.66
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 2.77
999
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.77
1000
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 250.06
TTFR rankings: 692
Ratio Superior: 2.77

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников