The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
801
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.18
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 3.32
802
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.55
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 3.32
803
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 180.73
TTFR rankings: 599
Ratio Superior: 3.31
804
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 119.23
TTFR rankings: 395
Ratio Superior: 3.31
805
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.76
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 3.31
806
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.66
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 3.31
807
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.84
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 3.31
808
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.33
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 3.31
809
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.1
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 3.31
810
Age: 20.7
Average rating: 341.46
TTFR rankings: 1128
Ratio Superior: 3.3
811
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 180.73
TTFR rankings: 597
Ratio Superior: 3.3
812
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.34
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 3.3
813
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.51
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 3.3
814
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.74
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 3.3
815
Age: 18
Average rating: 168.87
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 3.29
816
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.23
TTFR rankings: 152
Ratio Superior: 3.29
817
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.51
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 3.28
818
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 3.28
819
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.42
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 3.27
820
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.49
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 3.27
821
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.73
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 3.27
822
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.23
TTFR rankings: 151
Ratio Superior: 3.27
823
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.82
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 3.26
824
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.37
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 3.26
825
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.84
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 3.25
826
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.77
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 3.25
827
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.25
828
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.73
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 3.25
829
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.76
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 3.25
830
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.18
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 3.24
831
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.76
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.24
832
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.9
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 3.23
833
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.76
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 3.23
834
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.84
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 3.23
835
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.07
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 3.23
836
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.05
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 3.23
837
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.76
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 3.22
838
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.76
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 3.22
839
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.23
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 3.22
840
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 3.22
841
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.84
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 3.22
842
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 250.5
TTFR rankings: 805
Ratio Superior: 3.21
843
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.19
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 3.21
844
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.1
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 3.21
845
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 302.81
TTFR rankings: 971
Ratio Superior: 3.21
846
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.07
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 3.2
847
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.61
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.2
848
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.42
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 3.2
849
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.56
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 3.2
850
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.89
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 3.2
851
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 3.2
852
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.4
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.2
853
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.1
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 3.18
854
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.27
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.17
855
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.17
856
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.27
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 3.17
857
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.13
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 3.17
858
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.06
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 3.16
859
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.91
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 3.16
860
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 3.16
861
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.5
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 3.15
862
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.84
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 3.15
863
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.21
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 3.14
864
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.84
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 3.14
865
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 10.84
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 3.14
866
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.66
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 3.13
867
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.05
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 3.13
868
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.42
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 3.13
869
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 242.43
TTFR rankings: 757
Ratio Superior: 3.12
870
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.76
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 3.12
871
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.76
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 3.12
872
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.19
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 3.12
873
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 3.11
874
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.76
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 3.11
875
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.11
876
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.11
877
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.56
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.11
878
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.19
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 3.1
879
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.21
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 3.1
880
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.05
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.09
881
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.13
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 3.08
882
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.56
TTFR rankings: 383
Ratio Superior: 3.07
883
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.65
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 3.07
884
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.89
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 3.07
885
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.33
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 3.07
886
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.32
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 3.07
887
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.21
TTFR rankings: 482
Ratio Superior: 3.07
888
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.13
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.07
889
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.95
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.06
890
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.47
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 3.06
891
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.73
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 3.05
892
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 3.05
893
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.1
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 3.04
894
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.37
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 3.04
895
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.84
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 3.04
896
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.23
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 3.04
897
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.23
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 3.04
898
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.12
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 3.04
899
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 53.1
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 3.03
900
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.76
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 3.03

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников