The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№701
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.16
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 3.67
№702
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 112.85
TTFR rankings: 414
Ratio Superior: 3.67
№703
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.27
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.67
№704
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.6
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№705
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 244.61
TTFR rankings: 895
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№706
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 3.66
№707
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.15
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№708
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 148.32
TTFR rankings: 541
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№709
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.79
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 3.65
№710
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.36
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№711
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.07
TTFR rankings: 288
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№712
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.18
TTFR rankings: 572
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№713
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.44
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№714
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 208.69
TTFR rankings: 759
Ratio Superior: 3.64
№715
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.91
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№716
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 184.66
TTFR rankings: 671
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№717
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№718
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.75
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 3.63
№719
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.13
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№720
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.37
TTFR rankings: 392
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№721
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.32
TTFR rankings: 341
Ratio Superior: 3.62
№722
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.91
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 3.61
№723
Age: 16
Average rating: 88.94
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 3.61
№724
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.34
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 3.6
№725
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.18
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.6
№726
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.33
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№727
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.49
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№728
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.87
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№729
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.87
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№730
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.94
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№731
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.76
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 3.59
№732
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 119.19
TTFR rankings: 426
Ratio Superior: 3.57
№733
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 3.57
№734
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.12
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 3.57
№735
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.16
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 3.56
№736
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 208.69
TTFR rankings: 740
Ratio Superior: 3.55
№737
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.26
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 3.54
№738
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.54
№739
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.32
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 3.54
№740
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.76
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 3.54
№741
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.65
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 3.54
№742
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.66
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№743
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.98
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№744
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.06
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 3.53
№745
Age: 20
Average rating: 315.34
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№746
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.41
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№747
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.16
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№748
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.16
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.52
№749
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.34
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№750
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.94
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№751
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.74
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 3.51
№752
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.69
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№753
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.6
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№754
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№755
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.91
TTFR rankings: 178
Ratio Superior: 3.5
№756
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.03
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 3.49
№757
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.1
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№758
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.22
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 3.48
№759
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.47
№760
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.48
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 3.46
№761
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.4
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№762
Age: 8.2
Average rating: 10.72
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№763
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.89
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№764
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.88
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 3.45
№765
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.98
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 3.44
№766
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 143.02
TTFR rankings: 492
Ratio Superior: 3.44
№767
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.06
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 3.44
№768
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 302.79
TTFR rankings: 1040
Ratio Superior: 3.43
№769
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.7
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№770
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.18
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№771
Age: 16
Average rating: 88.94
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 3.42
№772
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.41
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№773
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.41
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№774
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 216.05
TTFR rankings: 737
Ratio Superior: 3.41
№775
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.76
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№776
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.26
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 3.4
№777
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.27
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 3.39
№778
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.39
№779
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.82
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№780
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.98
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№781
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.26
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№782
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.87
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№783
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.33
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№784
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.37
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 3.38
№785
Age: 18
Average rating: 168.83
TTFR rankings: 569
Ratio Superior: 3.37
№786
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.83
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 3.37
№787
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.14
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 3.36
№788
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№789
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.84
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№790
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№791
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.7
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 3.35
№792
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.65
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№793
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.55
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№794
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.16
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№795
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.65
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№796
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.86
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 3.34
№797
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.84
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.33
№798
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.03
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 3.33
№799
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.03
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 3.33
№800
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.89
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 3.32
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
