The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№601
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 279.45
TTFR rankings: 1152
Ratio Superior: 4.12
№602
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.09
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 4.12
№603
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 4.1
№604
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.77
TTFR rankings: 245
Ratio Superior: 4.1
№605
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 4.09
№606
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.62
TTFR rankings: 546
Ratio Superior: 4.09
№607
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.62
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 4.08
№608
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.62
TTFR rankings: 545
Ratio Superior: 4.08
№609
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.77
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 4.08
№610
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.77
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 4.08
№611
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.4
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 4.07
№612
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.17
TTFR rankings: 526
Ratio Superior: 4.07
№613
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.77
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 4.07
№614
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.38
TTFR rankings: 384
Ratio Superior: 4.07
№615
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 53.11
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 4.07
№616
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.28
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 4.06
№617
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.28
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 4.06
№618
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.77
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 4.06
№619
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.19
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 4.05
№620
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.25
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 4.02
№621
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.34
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 4.02
№622
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.7
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 4.01
№623
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.19
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 4.01
№624
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.72
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 4
№625
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.62
TTFR rankings: 535
Ratio Superior: 4
№626
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.51
TTFR rankings: 410
Ratio Superior: 4
№627
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 290.61
TTFR rankings: 1161
Ratio Superior: 4
№628
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.06
TTFR rankings: 148
Ratio Superior: 3.99
№629
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.85
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 3.99
№630
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.62
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 3.99
№631
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 200.82
TTFR rankings: 800
Ratio Superior: 3.98
№632
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.37
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 3.98
№633
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.22
TTFR rankings: 626
Ratio Superior: 3.98
№634
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.89
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 3.98
№635
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.66
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 3.98
№636
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 3.96
№637
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.82
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 3.96
№638
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.77
TTFR rankings: 236
Ratio Superior: 3.95
№639
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.56
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 3.94
№640
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.62
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 3.94
№641
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.52
TTFR rankings: 392
Ratio Superior: 3.94
№642
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.08
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 3.94
№643
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 3.93
№644
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.91
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 3.93
№645
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.81
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 3.91
№646
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.82
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 3.9
№647
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.42
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 3.9
№648
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 348.47
TTFR rankings: 1359
Ratio Superior: 3.9
№649
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.13
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 3.9
№650
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.49
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 3.89
№651
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 3.89
№652
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.33
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 3.88
№653
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.25
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 3.88
№654
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.49
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 3.87
№655
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 3.86
№656
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.22
TTFR rankings: 606
Ratio Superior: 3.85
№657
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.27
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 3.85
№658
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.62
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 3.84
№659
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.82
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 3.84
№660
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 3.83
№661
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.65
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 3.83
№662
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 328.12
TTFR rankings: 1254
Ratio Superior: 3.82
№663
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.85
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 3.82
№664
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.36
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 3.81
№665
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 3.81
№666
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 285.6
TTFR rankings: 1086
Ratio Superior: 3.8
№667
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 3.8
№668
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№669
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№670
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.77
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№671
Age: 8.4
Average rating: 10.83
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№672
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.7
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 3.79
№673
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.33
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 3.78
№674
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.06
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 3.78
№675
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.62
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 3.77
№676
Age: 20
Average rating: 315.36
TTFR rankings: 1188
Ratio Superior: 3.77
№677
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.28
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 3.75
№678
Age: 16
Average rating: 89
TTFR rankings: 334
Ratio Superior: 3.75
№679
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.85
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 3.75
№680
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.15
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 3.75
№681
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 3.75
№682
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.16
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 3.74
№683
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.49
TTFR rankings: 241
Ratio Superior: 3.74
№684
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 3.73
№685
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.19
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 3.72
№686
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.06
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 3.72
№687
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.12
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 3.72
№688
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.42
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 3.72
№689
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.4
TTFR rankings: 269
Ratio Superior: 3.72
№690
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.24
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 3.71
№691
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 11.59
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 3.71
№692
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.47
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 3.7
№693
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 3.69
№694
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 53.11
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 3.69
№695
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.4
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 3.69
№696
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.29
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 3.69
№697
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.83
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 3.69
№698
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.45
TTFR rankings: 252
Ratio Superior: 3.68
№699
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.82
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 3.68
№700
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.38
TTFR rankings: 347
Ratio Superior: 3.68
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
