The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
501
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 4.66
502
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.86
TTFR rankings: 153
Ratio Superior: 4.66
503
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.41
TTFR rankings: 336
Ratio Superior: 4.64
504
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 4.63
505
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.24
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 4.63
506
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.46
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 4.62
507
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.72
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 4.61
508
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.91
TTFR rankings: 138
Ratio Superior: 4.61
509
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 4.61
510
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.59
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 4.61
511
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.76
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 4.6
512
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 4.6
513
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.15
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 4.6
514
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.03
TTFR rankings: 593
Ratio Superior: 4.6
515
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 163.3
TTFR rankings: 750
Ratio Superior: 4.59
516
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.63
TTFR rankings: 191
Ratio Superior: 4.59
517
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.78
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 4.58
518
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.59
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 4.58
519
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.49
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 4.57
520
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.29
TTFR rankings: 207
Ratio Superior: 4.57
521
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.71
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 4.55
522
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.89
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 4.55
523
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.14
TTFR rankings: 360
Ratio Superior: 4.55
524
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.91
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 4.55
525
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.59
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 4.54
526
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.17
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 4.53
527
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 4.5
528
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.5
TTFR rankings: 353
Ratio Superior: 4.5
529
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.03
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 4.5
530
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.15
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 4.49
531
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.94
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 4.48
532
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 4.48
533
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.38
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 4.47
534
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.75
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 4.47
535
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.24
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 4.46
536
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.07
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 4.45
537
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.67
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 4.45
538
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.61
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 4.44
539
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.35
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 4.44
540
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.1
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 4.44
541
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.1
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 4.44
542
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.17
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 4.44
543
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.24
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 4.41
544
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.45
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 4.41
545
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.71
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 4.4
546
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.94
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 4.4
547
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.63
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 4.4
548
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.56
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 4.39
549
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.08
TTFR rankings: 404
Ratio Superior: 4.39
550
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 4.38
551
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.91
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 4.38
552
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.29
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 4.37
553
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.18
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 4.37
554
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.5
TTFR rankings: 343
Ratio Superior: 4.37
555
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.94
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 4.37
556
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.75
TTFR rankings: 226
Ratio Superior: 4.37
557
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 4.37
558
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.38
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 4.36
559
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.34
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 4.36
560
Age: 17
Average rating: 121.15
TTFR rankings: 528
Ratio Superior: 4.36
561
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.1
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 4.36
562
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.03
TTFR rankings: 456
Ratio Superior: 4.34
563
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.94
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 4.34
564
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.32
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 4.33
565
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.4
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 4.33
566
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 4.33
567
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 4.33
568
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.26
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 4.32
569
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 4.32
570
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.05
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 4.32
571
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.78
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 4.31
572
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.82
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 4.3
573
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.26
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 4.3
574
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.1
TTFR rankings: 674
Ratio Superior: 4.29
575
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.61
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 4.28
576
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.39
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 4.28
577
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.81
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 4.27
578
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 99.53
TTFR rankings: 425
Ratio Superior: 4.27
579
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.29
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 4.26
580
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.08
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 4.26
581
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.56
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 4.24
582
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.15
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 4.24
583
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.29
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 4.24
584
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.29
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 4.23
585
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.35
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 4.23
586
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.06
TTFR rankings: 410
Ratio Superior: 4.22
587
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.51
TTFR rankings: 433
Ratio Superior: 4.22
588
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.46
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 4.21
589
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 346.08
TTFR rankings: 1458
Ratio Superior: 4.21
590
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.72
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 4.21
591
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 53.11
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 4.2
592
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.5
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 4.18
593
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.89
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 4.17
594
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.41
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 4.16
595
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.29
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4.16
596
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.29
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 4.16
597
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.13
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 4.15
598
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.09
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 4.15
599
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.28
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 4.14
600
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 4.14

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников