The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
401
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.99
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.27
402
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.59
TTFR rankings: 161
Ratio Superior: 5.26
403
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.88
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 5.26
404
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.53
TTFR rankings: 539
Ratio Superior: 5.26
405
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.71
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 5.25
406
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 5.25
407
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 334.58
TTFR rankings: 1756
Ratio Superior: 5.25
408
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.86
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 5.23
409
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.16
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 5.23
410
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 84.85
TTFR rankings: 443
Ratio Superior: 5.22
411
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.11
TTFR rankings: 366
Ratio Superior: 5.22
412
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.13
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 5.21
413
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.4
TTFR rankings: 492
Ratio Superior: 5.21
414
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.11
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 5.21
415
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.17
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 5.19
416
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 142.95
TTFR rankings: 740
Ratio Superior: 5.18
417
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.71
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 5.18
418
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.59
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 5.17
419
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.58
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 5.16
420
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.07
TTFR rankings: 599
Ratio Superior: 5.16
421
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.99
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 5.16
422
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.99
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 5.16
423
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.91
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 5.15
424
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.08
TTFR rankings: 196
Ratio Superior: 5.15
425
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.28
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 5.14
426
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 5.14
427
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 5.14
428
Age: 9
Average rating: 11.3
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 5.13
429
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.59
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 5.13
430
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.73
TTFR rankings: 568
Ratio Superior: 5.13
431
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.6
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 5.12
432
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.81
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 5.12
433
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.11
TTFR rankings: 800
Ratio Superior: 5.09
434
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.45
TTFR rankings: 328
Ratio Superior: 5.09
435
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.87
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 5.08
436
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.32
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 5.08
437
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.08
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 5.08
438
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.86
TTFR rankings: 292
Ratio Superior: 5.05
439
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.07
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 5.05
440
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.09
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 5.04
441
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.09
TTFR rankings: 318
Ratio Superior: 5.04
442
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.15
TTFR rankings: 333
Ratio Superior: 5.03
443
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.66
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 5.03
444
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.5
TTFR rankings: 671
Ratio Superior: 5.03
445
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.15
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 5.02
446
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.23
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 5.02
447
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.91
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 5.01
448
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.86
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 5.01
449
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.2
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 5
450
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 4.99
451
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 4.97
452
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 4.96
453
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 4.96
454
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.62
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 4.93
455
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.87
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 4.92
456
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.16
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 4.91
457
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.1
TTFR rankings: 452
Ratio Superior: 4.91
458
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.13
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 4.91
459
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.72
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 4.9
460
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.99
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 4.9
461
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.1
TTFR rankings: 451
Ratio Superior: 4.9
462
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.77
TTFR rankings: 229
Ratio Superior: 4.9
463
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 167.7
TTFR rankings: 821
Ratio Superior: 4.9
464
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.83
TTFR rankings: 376
Ratio Superior: 4.89
465
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.11
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 4.88
466
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 4.87
467
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.57
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 4.87
468
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.69
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 4.87
469
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.67
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 4.85
470
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.32
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 4.84
471
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.32
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 4.84
472
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 163.31
TTFR rankings: 789
Ratio Superior: 4.83
473
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.32
TTFR rankings: 209
Ratio Superior: 4.82
474
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.75
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 4.82
475
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.25
TTFR rankings: 218
Ratio Superior: 4.82
476
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.87
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 4.82
477
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.08
TTFR rankings: 467
Ratio Superior: 4.81
478
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.6
TTFR rankings: 200
Ratio Superior: 4.81
479
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.02
TTFR rankings: 427
Ratio Superior: 4.8
480
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.73
TTFR rankings: 531
Ratio Superior: 4.8
481
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.08
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 4.78
482
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.58
TTFR rankings: 351
Ratio Superior: 4.77
483
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.71
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 4.76
484
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.88
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 4.76
485
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.13
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 4.75
486
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.42
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 4.75
487
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.5
TTFR rankings: 634
Ratio Superior: 4.75
488
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.71
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 4.74
489
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.04
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 4.73
490
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.45
TTFR rankings: 305
Ratio Superior: 4.73
491
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.5
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 4.73
492
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.85
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 4.73
493
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.45
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 4.72
494
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 4.71
495
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.87
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 4.71
496
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.13
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 4.7
497
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.13
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 4.68
498
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 53.07
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 4.67
499
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.74
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 4.67
500
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.39
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 4.66

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников