The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1601
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 198.63
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 1.67
№1602
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.22
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.67
№1603
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 111.07
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.67
№1604
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.46
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1605
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.72
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1606
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 215.51
TTFR rankings: 358
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1607
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.35
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1608
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1609
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.75
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 1.66
№1610
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.1
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1611
Age: 13
Average rating: 35.1
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1612
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.13
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1613
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.04
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1614
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.33
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1615
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.85
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 1.65
№1616
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.43
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1617
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.08
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1618
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.72
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1619
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1620
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1621
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.22
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1622
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.62
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1623
Age: 20.5
Average rating: 335.94
TTFR rankings: 551
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1624
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.27
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1625
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.5
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.64
№1626
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.76
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1627
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1628
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.97
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1629
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.25
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1630
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.78
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1631
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.96
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1632
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.68
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1633
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.63
№1634
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 181.17
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1635
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.68
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1636
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.74
TTFR rankings: 124
Ratio Superior: 1.62
№1637
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.93
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1638
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 250.95
TTFR rankings: 405
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1639
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.25
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1640
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.13
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1641
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1642
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 143.71
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1643
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.18
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1644
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.43
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 1.61
№1645
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 38.07
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1646
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 65.05
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1647
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 113.22
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1648
Age: 14
Average rating: 48.18
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1649
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 200.97
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1650
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 237.41
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 1.6
№1651
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.22
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1652
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.7
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1653
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.28
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1654
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 10.68
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1655
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1656
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.26
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1657
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 85.04
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1658
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.93
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1659
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.92
TTFR rankings: 198
Ratio Superior: 1.59
№1660
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.82
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1661
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.15
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1662
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 119.34
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1663
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.27
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1664
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.13
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1665
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.65
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1666
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.16
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1667
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1668
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.53
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1669
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.48
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1670
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.57
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1671
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 194.57
TTFR rankings: 307
Ratio Superior: 1.58
№1672
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.78
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1673
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.1
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1674
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.22
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1675
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.22
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1676
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.22
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1677
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 164.7
TTFR rankings: 259
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1678
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.79
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1679
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 111.07
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1680
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 111.07
TTFR rankings: 174
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1681
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.96
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1682
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 143.71
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 1.57
№1683
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.33
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1684
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.25
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1685
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.84
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.56
№1686
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.39
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.55
№1687
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.2
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.55
№1688
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.92
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.55
№1689
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.76
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 1.55
№1690
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.64
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.55
№1691
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.92
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1692
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 143.71
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1693
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.43
TTFR rankings: 121
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1694
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 79.08
TTFR rankings: 122
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1695
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.21
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1696
Age: 12
Average rating: 24.7
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1697
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.78
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1698
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.06
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1699
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.06
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.54
№1700
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 151.11
TTFR rankings: 232
Ratio Superior: 1.54
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
