The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1701
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.1
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1702
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.1
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1703
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.63
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1704
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.97
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1705
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.97
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1706
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.54
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1707
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.15
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.53
1708
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.14
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1709
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.11
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1710
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.6
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1711
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 346.88
TTFR rankings: 527
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1712
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.33
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1713
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.33
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1714
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.27
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.52
1715
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.29
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1716
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1717
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.14
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1718
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.74
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1719
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.74
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1720
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.91
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1721
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 143.02
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1722
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.8
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1723
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.15
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1724
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.61
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.51
1725
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.21
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1726
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.17
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1727
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.65
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1728
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.64
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1729
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.65
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1730
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.65
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1731
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.64
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1732
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 185.58
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1733
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1734
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1735
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.04
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1736
Age: 9
Average rating: 11.37
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.5
1737
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.61
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1738
Age: 17
Average rating: 120.62
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1739
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.27
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1740
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.13
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.49
1741
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.15
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1742
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.19
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1743
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.19
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1744
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.26
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1745
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.21
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1746
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.72
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1747
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.35
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1748
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 65
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1749
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1750
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 1.48
1751
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.16
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1752
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.29
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1753
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.68
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1754
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.74
TTFR rankings: 85
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1755
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.04
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1756
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.12
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 1.47
1757
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.27
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1758
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.35
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1759
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.67
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1760
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.6
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1761
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.29
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1762
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.18
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1763
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.18
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1764
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.91
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.46
1765
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.74
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1766
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 148.71
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1767
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.74
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1768
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.55
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1769
Age: 19
Average rating: 231.36
TTFR rankings: 335
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1770
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1771
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.49
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1772
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.35
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1773
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.8
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1774
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.59
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.45
1775
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.8
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1776
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.8
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1777
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.61
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1778
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 61.02
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1779
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.97
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1780
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.54
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1781
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.74
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1782
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.58
TTFR rankings: 192
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1783
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 100.29
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 1.44
1784
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 97.1
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1785
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 129.32
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1786
Age: 20.4
Average rating: 335.85
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1787
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.28
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1788
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.67
TTFR rankings: 115
Ratio Superior: 1.43
1789
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.42
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1790
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.42
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1791
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.54
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1792
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 150.99
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1793
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 92.12
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1794
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 143.59
TTFR rankings: 204
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1795
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.19
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1796
Age: 20.6
Average rating: 338.17
TTFR rankings: 480
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1797
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.6
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1798
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.91
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1799
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.43
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 1.42
1800
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.53
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.42

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников