The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1801
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.63
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1802
Age: 20.6
Average rating: 339.98
TTFR rankings: 480
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1803
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.97
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1804
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.3
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1805
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.22
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.41
1806
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.66
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1807
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.1
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1808
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.85
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1809
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.14
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1810
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 242.92
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1811
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 198.65
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1812
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.11
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1813
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 11.46
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1814
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1815
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.4
1816
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.16
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1817
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.52
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1818
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.3
TTFR rankings: 162
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1819
Age: 18.5
Average rating: 194.58
TTFR rankings: 271
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1820
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.69
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1821
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.46
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1822
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 168.86
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 1.39
1823
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 174.73
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1824
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.44
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1825
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.17
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1826
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.17
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1827
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 200.99
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1828
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.64
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1829
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 91.92
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1830
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 10.88
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1831
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1832
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1833
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.26
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.38
1834
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.1
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1835
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 96.95
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1836
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.96
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1837
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.96
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1838
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.93
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1839
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.13
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1840
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.63
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1841
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.55
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1842
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.55
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1843
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.68
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.37
1844
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.48
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1845
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.48
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1846
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.97
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1847
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.11
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1848
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.98
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1849
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.6
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1850
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.64
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1851
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.87
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1852
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.87
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.36
1853
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.79
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1854
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.08
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1855
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.4
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1856
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.77
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1857
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.73
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1858
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 164.48
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1859
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.69
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 1.35
1860
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.34
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1861
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.65
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1862
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.24
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1863
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.24
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1864
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.98
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 1.34
1865
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.46
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1866
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.06
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1867
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.14
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1868
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.76
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1869
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 133.46
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1870
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 81.45
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1871
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.58
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.33
1872
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 286.04
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1873
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 116.3
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1874
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.85
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1875
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.17
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1876
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 290.34
TTFR rankings: 383
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1877
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.96
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1878
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.17
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1879
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 37.93
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1880
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.79
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 1.32
1881
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.97
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1882
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.97
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1883
Age: 20.7
Average rating: 341.57
TTFR rankings: 448
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1884
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 334.33
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1885
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.79
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1886
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.64
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1887
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.64
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1888
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.68
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1889
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 175.33
TTFR rankings: 229
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1890
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.14
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.31
1891
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 242.92
TTFR rankings: 317
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1892
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.09
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1893
Age: 20.8
Average rating: 346.25
TTFR rankings: 450
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1894
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.17
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1895
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.76
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.3
1896
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.77
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1897
Age: 19
Average rating: 231.28
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1898
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.16
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1899
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.19
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.29
1900
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.46
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 1.29

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников