The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1901
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.19
TTFR rankings: 48
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1902
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.49
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1903
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.33
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1904
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.1
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1905
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.1
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.29
№1906
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 91.92
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1907
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.62
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1908
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.62
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1909
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 110.82
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1910
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 142.93
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1911
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.09
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1912
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.09
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1913
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.49
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1914
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.59
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1915
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 100.17
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1916
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1917
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.43
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1918
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.09
TTFR rankings: 134
Ratio Superior: 1.28
№1919
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.69
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1920
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 91.92
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1921
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.58
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1922
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1923
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.13
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1924
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.14
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1925
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 297.62
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1926
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.16
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1927
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.96
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.27
№1928
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.62
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1929
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.62
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1930
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.17
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1931
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.25
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1932
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 51.58
TTFR rankings: 65
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1933
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 242.93
TTFR rankings: 306
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1934
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1935
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.79
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1936
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.14
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1937
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 34.24
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1938
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.41
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1939
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.85
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 1.26
№1940
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 13.55
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1941
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.95
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1942
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 25.53
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1943
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 15.16
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1944
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 94.27
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1945
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.12
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1946
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.12
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1947
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 64.76
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1948
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.82
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1949
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.61
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1950
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.13
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.25
№1951
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.97
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1952
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.78
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1953
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.26
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1954
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1955
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1956
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1957
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 112.97
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1958
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.49
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1959
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.62
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1960
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 124.69
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 1.24
№1961
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 291.47
TTFR rankings: 359
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1962
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.68
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1963
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 78.82
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1964
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 78.82
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1965
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.75
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1966
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.1
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1967
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.85
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1968
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.56
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1969
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.85
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.23
№1970
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 291.47
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1971
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.74
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1972
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 40.13
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1973
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.49
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1974
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.67
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.22
№1975
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 73.26
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1976
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 181.21
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1977
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.78
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1978
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.78
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1979
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.52
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1980
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.74
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1981
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 215.54
TTFR rankings: 260
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1982
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.25
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.21
№1983
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.43
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1984
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.62
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1985
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.31
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1986
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 69.97
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1987
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 35.85
TTFR rankings: 43
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1988
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.72
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1989
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 60.97
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1990
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 39.26
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1991
Age: 15
Average rating: 66.02
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 1.2
№1992
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.62
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1993
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.47
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1994
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.56
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1995
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 76.46
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1996
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1997
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 42.14
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1998
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.09
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№1999
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.62
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.19
№2000
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.19
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 1.18
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников