The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№2001
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 50.68
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2002
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.12
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2003
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 329.26
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2004
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 22.86
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2005
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 43.18
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2006
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.78
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2007
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 30.51
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2008
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 174.79
TTFR rankings: 206
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2009
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 249.99
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2010
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 78.24
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.18
№2011
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 29.82
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 1.17
№2012
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.2
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.17
№2013
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.47
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2014
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.35
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2015
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.66
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2016
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.54
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2017
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 249.99
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2018
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 32.77
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2019
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.51
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2020
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.59
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2021
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.15
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 1.16
№2022
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.13
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2023
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.8
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2024
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.67
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2025
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2026
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2027
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.66
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2028
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.51
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2029
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 23.51
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2030
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 235.76
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 1.15
№2031
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.72
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2032
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.72
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2033
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 102.56
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2034
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 80.67
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2035
Age: 17.4
Average rating: 142.97
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2036
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 185.17
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2037
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 235.76
TTFR rankings: 268
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2038
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.12
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.14
№2039
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 41.41
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2040
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 139.22
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2041
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 157.79
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2042
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.13
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2043
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.11
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2044
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 31.82
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2045
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.18
TTFR rankings: 33
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2046
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.1
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2047
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.1
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2048
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 22.2
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2049
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 68.42
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2050
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 26.66
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2051
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.22
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 1.13
№2052
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.59
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№2053
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 59.59
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№2054
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.17
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№2055
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.83
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№2056
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 249.99
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№2057
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 197.54
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 1.12
№2058
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 329.26
TTFR rankings: 367
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2059
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.15
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2060
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 21.54
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2061
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 70.06
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2062
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 20.66
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2063
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 46.8
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2064
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.13
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2065
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 45.1
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2066
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 66.83
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2067
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.99
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2068
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.56
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 1.11
№2069
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 37.11
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2070
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 105.15
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2071
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 150.95
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2072
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 332.2
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2073
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 33.71
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2074
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 10.94
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2075
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2076
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2077
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 29.18
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2078
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 108.56
TTFR rankings: 119
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2079
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 11.86
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2080
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.62
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2081
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 56.62
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.1
№2082
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 28.35
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2083
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 63.15
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2084
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 27.47
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2085
Age: 18
Average rating: 170.35
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2086
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 12.85
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2087
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.04
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2088
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 272.66
TTFR rankings: 297
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2089
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 55.17
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2090
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 329.26
TTFR rankings: 358
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2091
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.75
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2092
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 48.75
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2093
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 15.66
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2094
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 46.06
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 1.09
№2095
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 12.92
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№2096
Age: 16
Average rating: 89.04
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№2097
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 52.88
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№2098
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№2099
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 72.51
TTFR rankings: 78
Ratio Superior: 1.08
№2100
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 57.72
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 1.07
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
